Kenosis theory is simply the doctrine that Jesus gave up (or did not utilize) some/all of His divine attributes while He was on earth. It is based, mostly, on Philippians 2:7 which says, 'but emptied Himself, taking the form of a bond-servant, and being made in the likeness of men.' I've been involved in an interesting message board dialogue on this issue for the past few days.
Personally, I am not convinced that Jesus, God in the flesh, utilized personal divine attributes at any time between his conception and the cross. Perhaps strangely, though, my main basis for this isn't Philippians 2:7, but the Gospels themselves. To me, Jesus' self-limitations had less to do with emptying himself of divine attributes and more to do with truly taking-on flesh. To truly become human, in my current opinion, implies self-limitation.
That is why Jesus did so many things that God simply cannot do. God can't be born, God can't grow in wisdom, God can't be tempted, God can't grow weary, God can't be ignorant of information, and God can't die. Jesus, however, was born, grew in wisdom, was tempted, got tired, didn't know some things, and died. Why? Because he truly became flesh and flesh experiences those things.
But, you might say, what about all those miraculous things Jesus did? Aren't those evidence of him utilizing his divine powers? I certainly think they are evidence of divine power, but not specifically his divine power. I think everything Jesus did between conception and the cross he did by submission to the Father and empowerment by the Holy Spirit.
We don't have any reliable accounts of Jesus doing miraculous things prior to his baptism. So what happened at Jesus' baptism that changed things? Did he just figure out that he had divine powers? No, the Spirit of God descended on him (Matt 3:16), remained on him (John 1:32), and filled him (Luke 4:1). After that point we have further proof that everything Jesus did was by the power of the Spirt. When he healed sick people (ie. Matt 12:15) it was part of a prophecy that Isaiah had been given in Isaiah 42:1-4. Matthew quotes that prophecy which includes the line, "I will put my Spirit on him." It seems to me Jesus healed the sick, then, by the power of the Holy Spirit. What's more, Jesus himself said, in Matthew 12:28, "But if I drive out demons by the Spirit of God, then the kingdom of God has come upon you." So did Jesus drive out demons using his own divine attributes? No. He drove them out by the Spirit of God. It seems to me Jesus did everything in his ministry by the Spirit, even the more mundane things like travelling (Luke 4:1, 14), preaching (Luke 4:18), and praising (Luke 10:21).
Thus, I feel comfortable enough to make the claim that Jesus, between his conception and the cross, never used his divine attributes at all. Not a single time. Instead, he limited himself to the status of a mere human being and became a servant of God. He submitted to the leadership of the Holy Spirit in his life. By the power of the Holy Spirit He preached, praised, prayed, healed the sick, cast out demons, performed various miracles, discerned people's thoughts, had the strength to obey his father, etc.
To me, this is a very exciting realization. Why? It's exciting because I, as someone who wants more than anything to live like Jesus, will never have divine attributes. But I very much can be filled with the Holy Spirit! You know, when the Apostles did miracles, even raising people from the dead, we don't declare that they had 'divine attributes,' we simply recognize that they were Spirit-filled people, just like we can be. Jesus wasn't simply God walking around with skin, he was truly man and, therefore, truly an 'example' (John 13:15, 1 Cor 11:1, Phil 2:5, 1 Pet 4:1, John 14:12, Heb 10:34, etc) of how we can live obedient and Spirit filled life as well.
Feel free to sharpen or annihilate my view via comment :)
7 comments:
wow, i'm speechless and may have to get back to this later...i've never taken the time to think this deeply into this topic.
that is good stuff matthew... actually this is a revelation that God has challenged my thinking in this past year... there was a special speaker that came to GM and gave us this idea...
i find myself conflicted sometimes with this because i almost feel irreverant by saying that Jesus had no power outside of the Spirit's because it sounds like i say that Jesus had no power... but at the same time it does give hope as you made mention of... if it was the Spirit who gave power in Jesus' life, then what can I do with the Spirit's power in me??? it is exciting to think about as well as a bit intimidating...
good stuff matt....
this is my assistant pastor once again displaying a great level of wisdom and insight and in whom I am well pleased!
Joe Payne
Senior Pastor
Hess Road Wesleyan Church
I am well pleased with him as well.
Rev. Kirk Perry
Senior Pastor
Central Wesleyan Church.
This doctrine i feel gives a whole new perspective to what the church is able to do through the power of the Spirit.
AND 10-0 I have to say you are the man.
hey matt. of course, you are always thoughtful and carefully nuanced and never throw stuff onto the web without thinking through it!
first, i absolutely agree with your belief that it is in the power of the Spirit that Jesus' performs his miracles and lives a perfect life. as wesleyans (small 'w') we take hope that we can live perfected lives because of the work of Christ in sending hte Spirit at Pentecost. we live by the same resources he did (the Spirit and the Word), although we could not have outside his mediating and effective action and are transformed by his mediating action in baptism and communion.
however, i am unsure how to think of Jesus in terms of atributes. (and this is genuine uncertainty, not disagreement masked in uncertainty language.) the early church doctrine of mary as 'theotokos' (bearer of God) described how the divine Son took on human nature. and the council of Chalcedon affirms that Jesus is two natures in one person without mixture or separation. i think it best to think of Jesus in terms of person, because persons act, attributes don't.
what i want to argue then, is not to speak of Jesus in terms of divine and human attributes, but in terms of the person who is at once divine and human. so, our doctrine of God gets reworked because of incarnation: God cannot be tempted, but the Incarnate God can be. God cannot die, but the Incarnate God can. God does not grow in wisdom, but the Incarnate God does.
thanks for the feedback everyone, i will continue thinking about these things for years I'm sure! :)
AP, what do you think about Jesus' current status in regards to incarnation and self-limitation? Hopefully you'll see this question, if not I'll pry talk to you on MSN :)
Post a Comment